data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9b91/e9b91e9ff0cbd7b4d43a562fdef4570c0cf7c46f" alt=""
Sebi has found stark variance in the disclosures of promoters holding across the four quarters in the year 2008. In March 2009, the company reported a promoter holding of 18.2 per cent, from 38.3 per cent in December 2008. But the company did not report this fall, as is required by the regulator. “This shows that the promoters have tried to reconcile their wrong holdings reported by them in last four quarters by giving the supposedly correct holding for the March 2009 quarter,” the order said.
Asked about the discrepancy, a GHCL spokesperson said, “We are studying the Sebi order and will reply to Sebi. We cannot comment as the matter is sub-judice.” Among other things, Sebi discovered that GHCL had disclosed that promoters held 10,200,110 shares or 10 per cent of the company’s equity through Carissa Holdings for the quarter ended December 2008, which was approximately six times the actual holdings. By February 16, 2009, the company said Carissa Holdings’ shareholding was 16,06,752 shares or 1.6 per cent of GHCL’s equity.
Is it another Satyam ????
Asked about the discrepancy, a GHCL spokesperson said, “We are studying the Sebi order and will reply to Sebi. We cannot comment as the matter is sub-judice.” Among other things, Sebi discovered that GHCL had disclosed that promoters held 10,200,110 shares or 10 per cent of the company’s equity through Carissa Holdings for the quarter ended December 2008, which was approximately six times the actual holdings. By February 16, 2009, the company said Carissa Holdings’ shareholding was 16,06,752 shares or 1.6 per cent of GHCL’s equity.
Is it another Satyam ????
Still not clear.. did anyone have idea
ReplyDelete